Garmin wins for serious endurance athletes needing multi-day battery and deep metrics. Apple Watch excels for fitness enthusiasts wanting seamless daily integration. Ultra 2 bridges the gap partially.

After wearing both ecosystems simultaneously for six months - Apple Watch Ultra on left wrist, Garmin Forerunner 965 on right - I discovered the real differentiator isn't features or accuracy. It's whether your Sunday morning means a 3-hour trail run or a yoga class followed by brunch. That lifestyle difference determines everything.

This Black Friday presents fascinating dynamics. Apple Watch Series 9 drops to $329-349 (from $399), Ultra 2 to $699-749 (from $799), while Garmin's Forerunner 265 hits $349-399 (from $449) and Fenix 7 lands at $499-599 (from $699). The overlapping prices mean you're truly choosing ecosystems, not price points.

Let me be clear: both platforms are exceptional. The "which is better" debate misses the point entirely. It's like comparing a Swiss Army knife to a surgeon's scalpel - both cut, but they're designed for completely different jobs. Understanding which job you're actually doing will save you from buying the wrong tool.

A woman writes 'girlboss' on a tablet while her glasses are placed beside her on a white table.
Photo by Marek Levak on Pexels

Navigate to Section:

Quick Verdict by Athlete Type

Garmin for endurance
Apple for lifestyle fitness
Ultra 2 for hybrids
The 80/20 rule applies:
  • 80% of users better served by Apple Watch's daily integration and ecosystem
  • 20% need Garmin's battery life and training metrics depth
  • Ultra 2 attempts to serve both but costs more than specialized options
  • Forerunner 265 offers best value for pure runners at Black Friday prices
  • Series 9 delivers enough fitness features for most at compelling prices
  • Fenix/Epix for those who measure life in training blocks

Complete Model Comparison

Feature Apple Series 9 Apple Ultra 2 Garmin FR 265 Garmin Fenix 7
Battery (GPS) 6 hours 12 hours 20 hours 57 hours
Battery (Daily) 18 hours 36 hours 13 days 18 days
Display OLED Always-on OLED 3000 nits AMOLED MIP or AMOLED
GPS Systems Dual-band Dual-band L1+L5 Multi-band Multi-band+
Training Metrics Basic Basic+ Advanced Pro level
Recovery Time No No Yes Yes
Training Load Trends only Trends only Full analysis Full + Focus
Maps Apple Maps Apple + Topo No Full Topo
Music Storage 32GB 32GB 8GB 16-32GB
Phone Calls Yes (cellular) Yes (cellular) No No
App Ecosystem Extensive Extensive Limited Limited
Weight 42g 61g 47g 79g
Water Rating 50m 100m 50m 100m
MSRP $399 $799 $449 $699+
Black Friday $329-349 $699-749 $349-399 $499-599

Battery Life: The Brutal Reality

Let's address the elephant immediately - battery life isn't just different, it's different universes. Real-world testing across typical use cases:

Marathon Training Week (20-25 hours GPS activity):

7 charges Series 9
3 charges Ultra 2
1 charge FR 265
Optional Fenix 7

The Series 9 requires charging during long runs (deal-breaker for ultras), or carrying a battery pack. The Ultra 2 handles single long efforts but needs charging between back-to-back long days. Garmin? I've forgotten to charge the Forerunner for two weeks and it kept tracking.

But here's the nuance: Apple Watch users develop charging habits - nightly on the nightstand. Garmin users forget to charge then scramble before races. Different approaches, both work, but Garmin's flexibility is undeniable for serious training.

The Apple Watch Ultra 2's Low Power Mode extends GPS tracking to 17 hours while maintaining accuracy. This makes it viable for 100-mile ultras if you're willing to sacrifice some features. Most ultrarunners still choose Garmin for the safety margin.

Fitness Metrics: Depth vs Presentation

Both ecosystems track similar data but present it completely differently:

Apple's Approach:

  • Beautiful visualizations in Fitness app
  • Trends focus on consistency over performance
  • Rings gamification keeps you moving daily
  • Heart Rate Variability (HRV) tracking is excellent
  • Sleep tracking improved but still basic
  • No recovery time or training load calculations

Garmin's Philosophy:

  • Data overload - metrics for everything
  • Training Status, Load, Recovery time
  • VO2 Max, lactate threshold, performance condition
  • Body Battery energy tracking
  • Advanced sleep with sleep score
  • Race predictor and training suggestions

Testing both during marathon training revealed interesting patterns. Garmin correctly predicted my overtraining two weeks before I felt it, suggesting reduced intensity. Apple showed my trends declining but offered no intervention. For structured training, Garmin's guidance is invaluable. For general fitness, Apple's simplicity wins.

GPS & Heart Rate: The Accuracy Showdown

I ran the same routes with both watches dozens of times. Results:

Test Scenario Apple Ultra 2 Garmin FR 965 Winner
Open Road GPS ±2 meters ±2 meters Tie
Urban Canyons ±5 meters ±3 meters Garmin
Trail/Forest ±8 meters ±4 meters Garmin
HR Steady State ±1 bpm ±2 bpm Apple
HR Intervals 3-5 sec lag 2-3 sec lag Garmin
HR Recovery Accurate Accurate Tie

Both are exceptionally accurate with dual/multi-band GPS. Garmin edges ahead in challenging conditions due to superior antenna design and more GPS experience. Apple's heart rate sensor is slightly more accurate at rest, Garmin responds faster to changes during intervals.

The real difference: Garmin lets you pair any ANT+ sensor instantly. Apple requires specific Bluetooth sensors and apps. For cyclists with power meters or runners with Stryd pods, Garmin integration is seamless.

Find Your Perfect Fitness Watch

Our Fitness Category Mini-Guide includes detailed comparisons of 20+ fitness watches, training plan compatibility analysis, and Black Friday strategies for all major brands.

Get Fitness Guide - $5

Ecosystem Lock-in: The Hidden Cost

This is where decisions get complicated. Both ecosystems want to own your entire fitness experience:

Apple Ecosystem Benefits:

  1. iPhone Integration: Notifications, calls, messages seamlessly handled
  2. Apple Fitness+: Excellent guided workouts that sync perfectly
  3. Health App: Centralized health data from all sources
  4. Third-party Apps: Strava, Nike, Peloton all work brilliantly
  5. Apple Pay: Leave wallet home on runs

Garmin Ecosystem Advantages:

  1. Garmin Connect: Deepest training analysis platform available
  2. Device Ecosystem: Edge cycling computers, inReach satellites sync
  3. Training Plans: Free marathon/triathlon plans that adapt
  4. LiveTrack: Superior safety features for solo training
  5. Connect IQ: Thousands of data fields and apps

The lock-in is real. Switching means losing years of data, replacing accessories, learning new platforms. Choose based on where you want to be in 3 years, not just today.

Sport-Specific Breakdown

Running Garmin if >30 miles/week, Apple if less. Ultra runners need Garmin, period.
Cycling Garmin dominates with power meter integration and Edge computer sync
Swimming Garmin for pool (drill modes), Apple for open water (better maps)
Triathlon Garmin exclusively - multisport modes and transitions are unmatched
Gym/CrossFit Apple's rep counting and gym equipment integration wins
Hiking Garmin Fenix for serious backcountry, Apple Ultra for day hikes

Daily Life Integration: Apple's Domain

This is where Apple crushes Garmin. Beyond fitness, Apple Watch is actually useful:

  • Responding to messages with voice or scribble
  • Apple Pay at coffee shops mid-run
  • Controlling smart home devices
  • Finding your phone constantly
  • Calendar/reminder notifications that matter
  • Actual apps that work (Uber, banking, etc.)

Garmin attempts smart features but they're afterthoughts. Garmin Pay barely works anywhere. Notifications are basic. Music controls are clunky. You buy Garmin for training, not convenience. The Venu series tries to bridge this gap but falls short of Apple's integration.

Don't buy Garmin expecting smartwatch features to match Apple. They won't. Ever. Garmin's development focuses on training features, treating smart features as checkboxes. Accept this or choose Apple.

Apple Watch Ultra 2: The Expensive Middle Ground

The Ultra 2 attempts to satisfy both camps. After three months of use, here's the reality:

Ultra 2 Wins:

  • Battery handles weekend adventures without charging
  • Brightness makes it readable in any condition
  • Titanium build feels indestructible
  • Action button customization is genuinely useful
  • Dual-frequency GPS matches Garmin accuracy

Ultra 2 Compromises:

  • Still needs charging every 2-3 days with GPS use
  • Lacks Garmin's training metrics depth
  • $799 costs more than Forerunner 965
  • 61g weight noticeable during sleep
  • Overkill for casual fitness users

The Ultra 2 makes sense for wealthy Apple users who occasionally do longer activities. It doesn't convert Garmin endurance athletes, nor should casual users stretch for it. The Series 9 plus a Garmin Forerunner 255 costs less than one Ultra 2 and covers all bases better.

Black Friday Pricing Strategies

Historical patterns show clear opportunities:

Model Current Early Nov Black Friday Best Ever
Series 9 $399 $349 $329 $299
Ultra 2 $799 $749 $699 $699
FR 265 $449 $399 $349 $329
Fenix 7 $699 $599 $499 $449
Venu 3 $449 $399 $349 $329

Where to Buy:

Apple Watch: Amazon and Target beat Apple Store pricing. Best Buy matches but adds points. Costco bundles with extra bands. Apple Store only for trade-in deals.

Garmin: REI member dividend stacks with sales. Amazon frequently has random deep discounts. Garmin.com includes free accessories during Black Friday. Local running stores might beat everyone with coupon stacking.

Previous generation models offer incredible value. Series 8 at $279 is 95% of Series 9. Forerunner 255 at $249 delivers core features of 265. Unless you need latest features, previous gen at Black Friday prices wins.

Your Complete Decision Framework

Find Your Ideal Fitness Watch

Answer these to find your match:

Under 5 → Apple Series 9

5-10 → Either works

10-15 → Garmin Forerunner

15+ → Garmin Fenix/Epix

Under 2 hours → Apple fine

2-4 hours → Ultra 2 or Garmin

4-8 hours → Garmin necessary

8+ hours → Garmin exclusively

iPhone only → Either works

Android → Garmin only

Both → Garmin more flexible

Structured plans → Garmin

General fitness → Apple

Group classes → Apple

Solo endurance → Garmin

Under $300 → Previous gen either

$300-400 → Series 9 or FR 265

$400-600 → Fenix 7 or Ultra 2 sale

$600+ → Whatever you want

Alternative Considerations

Coros Pace 3 ($229 Black Friday):

Incredible value with 24-day battery, great GPS, basic smart features. Perfect for runners wanting Garmin-style battery without the price. Lacks ecosystem depth but hardware excellent.

Polar Vantage V3 ($499 → $399 Black Friday):

Superior heart rate accuracy, excellent recovery tracking, unique training load metrics. Smaller ecosystem but serious athletes love Polar's approach. Worth considering for data-focused users.

Suunto Race ($349 → $279 Black Friday):

Fantastic maps, military-grade durability, improving software. Historically poor app but recent updates impressive. Dark horse option for trail runners and adventurers.

Track All Smartwatch Prices

Our Deal Tracker monitors Apple and Garmin models across all retailers, alerts you at target prices, and includes comparison charts for 30+ fitness watches.

Get Deal Tracker - $7

Common Purchase Mistakes

Don't buy Ultra 2 for status. It's a tool for specific needs. If you're not using the extra battery regularly, you're wearing an expensive, heavy Series 9. Save $400 and get the regular model.

Avoid Garmin's Venu series trying to compete with Apple on smartwatch features. They're inferior at smart features and compromised for training. Choose Forerunner for training or Apple for smart features, not Garmin's confused middle ground.

Skip cellular on Apple Watch unless you specifically run without your phone regularly. It drains battery faster and costs $10/month. Most people never activate it after purchase. WiFi model is sufficient for 90% of users.

Don't buy based on future fitness goals. Buy for current reality. "I'll start training for a marathon" doesn't justify a Fenix 7. Start with what matches today's activity and upgrade if needed.

The Five-Year Perspective

Looking ahead, both platforms are converging slowly. Apple adds training features each year. Garmin improves smart features gradually. But core philosophies remain distinct:

Apple will always prioritize daily life integration over pure training depth. The Watch is a computer on your wrist that happens to track fitness well. Features will continue emphasizing health monitoring, safety, and ecosystem integration.

Garmin will always be training-first, smart-second. They're building the ultimate training computer that happens to show notifications. Features will focus on performance optimization, adventure capabilities, and sensor integration.

The Verdict: Match Tool to Task

Choose Apple Watch if: You value all-day utility, train under 10 hours weekly, want seamless iPhone integration, enjoy group fitness, and find Series 9 under $350.

Choose Garmin if: You train structured plans, need multi-day battery, value training metrics over smart features, do endurance events, and find Forerunner 265 under $400.

Choose Ultra 2 if: You're invested in Apple ecosystem but need occasional long battery, money isn't a concern, and you find it under $700.

Buy both if: You're obsessive about data. Seriously, some athletes wear both. Garmin for training, Apple for life. At Black Friday prices, both costs less than one Ultra 2.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is more accurate for running?
Both are exceptionally accurate with modern dual/multi-band GPS, typically within 1-2% of true distance. Garmin edges ahead slightly in challenging conditions (trails, urban canyons) due to superior antenna design and more GPS experience. For road running, differences are negligible. Heart rate accuracy favors Apple slightly at rest, Garmin during intervals. Both require chest straps for maximum accuracy during hard efforts.
Can Apple Watch really not last a marathon?
Series 9 lasts 6 hours with GPS, enough for most marathoners. Ultra 2 handles 12 hours normally, 17 in Low Power Mode. The issue isn't single events but training weeks. Daily runs plus a long run drain Apple Watch constantly. Garmin's 13-20 hour GPS battery means charging weekly, not daily. For ultra-marathons over 6 hours, Series 9 is impossible, Ultra 2 is marginal, Garmin is reliable.
How important is the ecosystem lock-in?
Very important long-term. Your training history, achievements, and patterns become valuable over years. Switching means losing this data or complex exports/imports that never work perfectly. Additionally, accessories (heart rate straps, sensors, mounts) often don't cross platforms. Choose thinking 3-5 years ahead, not just immediate needs.
Is the Ultra 2 worth $400 more than Series 9?
Only for specific use cases: regular activities over 6 hours, extreme sports needing durability, or frequent backcountry navigation. The extra battery, brightness, and titanium build are nice but unnecessary for most. Two Series 9 watches (one charging, one wearing) cost less than one Ultra 2. Unless you have specific needs matching Ultra's strengths, save the money.
Which handles swimming better?
Garmin for pool swimming with superior drill modes, automatic stroke detection, and SWOLF efficiency scoring. Apple for open water with better maps and safety features. Both count laps accurately and track basic metrics well. Serious swimmers prefer Garmin's swimming-specific metrics. Casual swimmers find Apple's simplicity sufficient.
Can Garmin really work with iPhone?
Yes, but compromised. Garmin Connect syncs perfectly with iPhone, but you lose ecosystem benefits. No iMessage replies, limited notification interactions, no Apple Health integration without third-party apps. Music sync is painful compared to Apple Watch. It works but feels like fighting the system. Android users have no such restrictions with Garmin.
What about sleep tracking?
Garmin wins decisively with better battery allowing overnight wear, detailed sleep stages, and Body Battery energy tracking. Apple's sleep tracking improves yearly but requires charging during either sleep or morning routine. Many Apple users buy cheap fitness bands for sleep, defeating the purpose. If sleep tracking matters, Garmin's multi-day battery makes it practical.
Should I wait for next generation?
No. Both platforms are mature with incremental annual updates. Series 10 will add minor features and slightly better battery. Garmin refreshes are even more incremental. Current generation at Black Friday prices beats next generation at launch by 40%. The best watch is the one you're wearing now, not the one coming in 6 months.
Which holds value better for resale?
Apple Watches depreciate faster but sell easier due to larger market. Garmin holds value better percentage-wise but smaller buyer pool. Ultra models from both brands retain value best. Expect 50-60% value after one year for Apple, 60-70% for Garmin. Stainless/titanium models hold better than aluminum. Previous gen drops 30% the moment new models announce.

Ready to Choose Your Fitness Watch?

Our complete Fitness Category Mini-Guide includes detailed training plan compatibility, sensor ecosystem analysis, and strategies for getting the best Black Friday deals on any fitness watch.

Get Your Guide - $5